"We didnâ€™t do anything wrong, but somehow we lostâ€, with these words Nokia CEO Stephen Elop ended his speech as the 150-year-old Finnish multinational company got acquired by Microsoft. One can imagine that if a mobile giant like Nokia failed to survive and thrive in the competitive era, how difficult it could be for startups.
According to a survey conducted by Forbes, 90 percent of startups fail. Yes, this is a hard and bleak truth. But, when it comes to reasons behind failure, different experts shared different anecdotes.
Below are not so common reasons behind startup failure that you can use to evaluate your own startup strategy.
Business Model Failure (CAC and LTV Rule)
A sustainable business model is a blueprint for success. Many startups fail to clearly demonstrate the following:
- How they will create value?
- What problem are they solving and for whom?
- How the business will stay competitive and of course resilience to change
With a vague business model, startups are unable to understand the ecosystem they are operating in and how technology will impact their business.
A Boston-based startup, Riot Vine, was founded in 2009 by Kabir Hemrajani. Unfortunately, the company dissolved in 2010 and the reason is absence of a business model.
Kabir, himself gave an interview to a local publication in which he said, "We spent three months head down developing Riot Vine without a business model. I think I didnâ€™t realize what we were building at the beginning. Riot Vine is closing. I genuinely want to thank everyone who signed up, posted an event, or used Riot Vine to discover what was happening around town.â€
The Right Approach
In the above example, we have seen that a startup was trying to establish itself without a business model. On the other hand, there is a market mantra around which a business model should be developed â€“ Cost of acquiring the customer (CAC) must be less than the lifetime value of that customer (LTV).
Acquiring customers takes money, resource and time. The best tricks to gain your customers for a lifetime are:
- Know your ideal customers
- Invest in customer retention
- Reduce customer attenuation
An American multinational computer software company, Adobe, saved its business through subscription revenue which significantly improves LTV.
The company offered Photoshop for $9.99 USD per month. This amount is 100X less than the cost of the perpetual license but Adobe now has two benefits:
- More number of customers
As price is less, more people will go for Photoshop.
- Lifetime customers
With $9.99 USD per month, customers stay with the company for a lifetime.
Minimum Viable Product (MVP) allows an entrepreneur to test his idea by exhibiting an early release of the product to target audience. The next step is to collect customerâ€™s feedback and make necessary changes.
MVP is more like a risk reduction tool as it gathers feedback about the product and avoids the possibility of wasting time and money. Many startups fail because they focus on building the product while minimizing their contact with target audience. In simple words, they donâ€™t implement the MVP concept.
A startup named, Devver, failed because "they made a mistake of focusing on engineering first and customer development second.â€
Ben, founder of Devver, said, "We should have asked, is there an even simpler version of this product that we can deliver sooner to learn more about pricing, market size, and technical challenges? We should have focused more on customer development and finding a MVP.â€
The Right Approach
While creating a MVP, one should find out the right balance between maximum value and minimum design. Few but most important functions are added during the MVP phase. MVP gives the required data that confirms the interest of users in a product. Steps that should be kept in mind during the development of MVP:
- Keep the product quality high with only few important features
- Track user behavior
- Donâ€™t think about the overall sustainability of a product
- Study the competition deeply
Hereâ€™s an example of a company that started as MVP:
In 2004, MySpace was the most popular social network. But then, Mark Zuckerberg entered Harvard University with the basic model of his product, Facebook. The MVP had only those features that would ensure its success.
After its incredible triumph, the students at University of Columbia, Yale, and Stanford started using it. Students, who used MVP, gave Mark the essential feedback that he later used to improve the product.
Problem with MMP
Minimum Marketable Product (MMP) â€“ The most basic product that dwells on user experience. MMP addresses requirements of a user, with the correct level of UI that can be sold and marketed successfully. Many companies failed as they targeted the wrong market segment and envisioned the wrong product or features.
In 1957, the American multinational automaker, Ford, manufactured Edsel which was considered as an automobile marque. The company invested heavily in this car but Americans wanted smaller and more economic vehicles at that time.
Thus, Edsel never gained popularity.
On November 19, 1959, Ford announced the end of the Edsel program and the company lost $350 million or the equivalent of $2.3 billion in 2016.
According to the Associated Content â€“ "Pundits have blamed its failure on Ford Motors execs, who never really defined the modelâ€™s niche in the car market. The pricing and market aim, of most Edsel models, were somewhere between the high-end Ford and the lowest-end Mercury.â€
Ford had absolutely no idea that the failure was going to happen until after the vehicles had been designed and built.
The Right Approach
Under MMP, itâ€™s all about creating a product for minimum number of people with the minimum number of features.
Many startups try to develop over-engineered products with lots of features that provide little or almost no value to users. The concept of MMP helps to focus on what really matters.
Take an example of original iPhone that was launched in 2007. Apple selected a narrow set of customers for its product. iPhone had less number of features than its competitors. But these limitations did not hinder its success. The public reaction to the launch of the iPhone resulted in media calling it as "Jesus phoneâ€.
Experts believe that the staggering success of iPhone is because the company focused on those features that made difference to users and developed a product for specific target audience.
Foundersâ€™ Ego and Power Struggle
Founders fail because they canâ€™t admit that they are wrong. They want to be seen as the smartest person in the company. They get stuck in their egos. Ego can actually be fatal for a startup. Ego is self-admiration and it prevents a founder from seizing innovative and beneficial opportunities.
GovWorks was founded in 1998 by two childhood friends. It was built to help government clients keep track of their contracts and citizens can apply for jobs and book tickets.
The company experienced an initial success but due to a power struggle between founders, personal ego and disagreements within management, it was sold in 2001.
An award winning documentary was made on GovWorksâ€™ demise i.e. "Statup.com.â€ The bottom line was, "when working with friends: egos need not apply.â€
The Right Approach
Founders usually stick with their original idea even if it doesnâ€™t work. They should learn to pivot whenever needed. However, pivoting should only be considered when absolutely necessary. There are many companies that pivoted and experienced massive success.
How to pivot?
- Pick up new goals
- Listen to your customers (what they want)
- Align goals with your vision
- Adopt features or changes whenever needed
A brand that pivoted successfully is YouTube, an American video sharing website. It started as a video-based dating service where people introduced themselves and recorded what they were looking for.
This concept didnâ€™t work and the founders decided to open it up for any video. It pivoted slowly and grew into a video empire.
Other reasons such as lack of passion, pricing of products, intra-team conflict, poor marketing strategies, and no or bad after sales service lead to startup failure.
In this vibrant ecosystem, itâ€™s important to understand and appreciate the reason behind failure of startups. Donâ€™t get demotivated by seeing what happened with others, instead follow your heart and write your own story of success.